He wasn’t looking for anything special. Just a child wandering through the fields, where every stone was a secret, and every shadow held a mystery. But then he saw them, pens, scattered across the dirt like fallen stars. He picked them up, turning them in his hands. He didn’t know why they were there, but somehow, he knew they belonged to him.
Years later, the world would understand what the boy had always felt; he was meant to write something that had never been written before. He filled pages with ideas that reshaped medicine, science, and human understanding. The pens had been waiting for him all along, tools for a mind that would one day carve its place in history.
Headlines
A research piece begins with a headline, the gateway to its impact. Professor Waqar Ahmed believes the headline must be strong enough to pull the reader in but simple enough to be understood at a glance. Writing ten variations helps distil the essence of the research, leading to a final choice that carries clarity, relevance, and intrigue.
A strong headline captures curiosity. Readers must be drawn in immediately, compelled by the importance of the study and its relevance to current problems. The professor argues that headline construction is a writing exercise and a strategic decision that determines the paper’s reach and influence. The most clickable, easy-to-grasp headline is the one that makes its way to the top of the list. For instance, headlines like “AI Revolutionizes Cancer Detection” immediately signal innovation and real-world stakes, setting the stage for engagement.
The process of crafting headlines involves iteration. Professor Ahmed advises researchers to avoid jargon-laden titles that alienate readers and focus on broadly resonating words. A headline must reflect the core discovery while hinting at its implications, ensuring that it appeals to specialists and curious laypeople. Over his career, he has seen how a well-chosen title can elevate a paper from obscurity to widespread recognition, amplifying its citation potential.
Introduction
Every research paper must begin with questions. These questions define the core issues, the gaps in existing knowledge, and the hypothesis that drives the research forward. A compelling introduction sets the tone, guiding the reader through a landscape of problems waiting to be solved.
Gaps in knowledge provide opportunities. The professor insists that the most impactful papers emerge from recognising where previous work has fallen short. A great researcher does not merely answer existing questions but creates new ones, challenging assumptions and pushing boundaries beyond their conventional limits. A hypothesis must not only propose an answer but demand further discussion, disagreement, and exploration. For example, asking “Can AI predict heart disease better than human doctors?” opens a door to both technological and ethical debates.
Introductions should avoid overloading readers with data. Instead, they must weave a narrative that connects the research to broader societal needs. Professor Ahmed often starts his papers with a real-world problem—such as rising healthcare costs or diagnostic errors—before narrowing it to the specific question his study addresses. This approach ensures the work feels urgent and necessary, laying a foundation for the reader’s investment in the findings.
Literature
Excellent research is built on the shoulders of past work. Literature review is not just about summarising what has been written but about engaging critically with previous findings. The professor encourages researchers to be bold, to disagree with established theories, to question methodologies, and to highlight inconsistencies.
Papers that stand out do not merely support existing work but challenge it. The literature review should expose the weak points of past studies and position the new research as a necessary evolution. Academic debate is fuelled by confrontation—not personal, but intellectual. Annoying established scholars, questioning dominant ideas, and proposing alternative solutions make research valuable and drive the field forward. For instance, if prior studies overstated a drug’s efficacy, pointing this out with evidence positions the new work as a corrective force.
Professor Ahmed’s reviews are meticulous yet provocative. He teaches that citing a paper is not an endorsement but an opportunity to dissect its strengths and flaws. This critical lens has earned his work respect, as it demonstrates familiarity with the field and a willingness to advance it beyond its current state.
Methods
A study is only as valuable as its ability to be replicated. The methods section must present a clear, structured, and logical explanation of how the research was conducted. Every step should be written so that another researcher can follow the same path and arrive at the same conclusions.
Professor Waqar Ahmed believes that methodology is the true backbone of scientific writing. A well-documented process allows findings to gain credibility, ensuring that results are not accidental but intentional and repeatable. Precision and clarity in methods distinguish rigorous research from speculation. For example, detailing the exact parameters of an AI algorithm or the sample size of a clinical trial builds trust in the outcomes.
He advises against vague descriptions, urging researchers to specify tools, conditions, and variables. Over his career, his methodical rigour has allowed his studies to withstand scrutiny, contributing to their high citation count. Methods are not just instructions but proof of a study’s integrity.
Results
Findings must be presented with confidence. The results section is not a place for hesitation but for clear, definitive statements about what has been observed and measured. Any deviation from expected outcomes should be explained with insight, not defensiveness.
Professor Ahmed emphasises that true discoveries come from differences. If results do not align with previous research, it signals the potential for something new. A researcher must own their data and recognise its significance even when it contradicts established theories. It is in these contradictions that scientific revolutions begin. For instance, if a study finds a drug less effective than claimed, this discrepancy becomes the seed for further investigation.
Results should be concise yet comprehensive, using visuals like graphs or tables to enhance understanding. The professor’s papers often feature standout findings—like a 20% improvement in diagnostic accuracy—presented boldly to underscore their importance. This clarity ensures the work’s impact is immediately apparent.
Experimentation
A paper gains strength when results are tested further. Experimentation reinforces the validity of findings, proving their consistency across different scenarios. Researchers should not rely on a single set of results but demonstrate robustness through repeated trials and alternative approaches.
Professor Ahmed highlights that experimentation is not merely a step but a mindset. The best researchers never stop testing, refining, and questioning their conclusions. The goal is to be correct and thorough, ensuring that findings hold under multiple conditions and applications. For example, testing an AI model across diverse patient populations strengthens its real-world relevance.
His work often includes follow-up experiments, such as adjusting variables or expanding sample sizes. This relentless pursuit of validation has made his research a benchmark for reliability, inspiring others to adopt similar rigour.
Future Gaps
Excellent research does not conclude with answers but with more questions. Future gaps provide the next generation of researchers with new directions to explore. A paper should invite further study, clarifying where additional work is needed.
Professor Ahmed believes that leaving open-ended questions is a mark of impactful research. A study that claims to have solved everything leaves no room for progress. Instead, the most valuable work sparks curiosity, laying the groundwork for others to build upon. For instance, identifying limitations in AI-driven diagnostics points researchers toward refining the technology.
His papers often end with calls to action—specific challenges for the field. This forward-thinking approach ensures his work remains a catalyst for ongoing discovery, extending its influence beyond the initial publication.
Collaboration
No scientist achieves greatness alone. Collaboration expands research reach, allowing for diverse perspectives and interdisciplinary approaches. A paper that invites collaboration ensures that findings are tested in multiple environments, leading to more decisive conclusions and broader applications.
Professor Ahmed champions the idea that science is a conversation. Researchers must engage with their peers, exchange ideas, and welcome criticism. The best minds do not work in isolation but thrive through intellectual debate and shared knowledge. His collaborations with engineers, data scientists, and clinicians have produced groundbreaking insights, such as integrating AI into surgical procedures.
He encourages young researchers to seek out partners who challenge their assumptions. This dynamic interplay of ideas has been a cornerstone of his prolific career, amplifying the reach and relevance of his work.
Impact
A study’s actual value lies in its impact on the world. The findings must extend beyond academic journals and into real-world applications. Research should improve lives, advance industries, and contribute to the greater good.
Professor Ahmed teaches that the purpose of scientific discovery is not just to accumulate knowledge but to apply it. The most cited papers are not those that are merely well-written but those that change how people think, work, and live. His research on AI in diagnostics, for example, has influenced hospital protocols worldwide, reducing errors and saving lives.
The impact is measured not just in citations but in tangible outcomes. He urges researchers to consider their audience beyond academia—policymakers, practitioners, and patients—ensuring their work bridges theory and practice.
Writing Routine
Every day, the professor follows a structured routine. The day begins with writing, the most creative and mentally demanding task. This is followed by reading, ensuring his knowledge base constantly expands. Finally, time is dedicated to family, balancing intellectual pursuits and personal life.
The order of tasks is critical. Writing first ensures that energy is directed toward producing original work. Research and reading, though essential, are placed later to prevent the mind from becoming overwhelmed before creation begins. By following this disciplined approach, the professor has produced over 2,000 papers, each contributing to the advancement of science. This routine reflects his belief that consistency, not bursts of effort, drives long-term success.
Legacy
Professor Waqar Ahmed’s contributions extend far beyond his published work. His impact is seen in the students he has mentored, the ideas he has shaped, and the future researchers he continues to inspire.
His philosophy is simple—never stop questioning. The pursuit of knowledge is endless, and those who dedicate their lives to it must embrace the challenges, the failures, and the breakthroughs with equal passion. Through discipline, creativity, and relentless curiosity, he has shaped the course of scientific thought.
Few minds have left such an indelible mark on their field. His work is a testament to the power of dedication, the necessity of bold thinking, and the unwavering belief that discovery is a journey without end. Connect with him on his LinkedIn page to explore more about his transformative contributions.
How Local Governments Can Use Data and AI for Smarter Decision-Making